Standards for Static Protective FIBC

The ISO Technical Committee TC122 has responsibility for standardization in the field of packaging with regard to terminology and definitions, packaging dimensions, performance requirements and tests.  The Technical Committee is divided into a number of Working Groups (WG) each with responsibility for a different type of packaging or aspect of standardization. There is also a Sub-Committee (SC) of TC122 that has responsibility for standardizing performance requirements and tests for means of packaging, packages and unit loads, TC122/SC3. The standards developed by TC122/SC3 include the series covering transport packaging for dangerous goods (ISO 16101, ISO 16103, ISO 16106 and ISO 16883) and FIBC for non-dangerous goods (ISO 21898). Like its parent committee, TC122/SC3 is also divided into Working Groups, one of which (WG9) is responsible for the electrostatic properties of FIBC. In fact, WG9 is an integral part of a Joint Working Group (JWG) established by ISO and IEC.

The IEC Electrotechnical Technical Committee TC101 has responsibility for standardization in the field of electrostatics, and in particular for test methods to evaluate the generation, retention and dissipation of electrostatic charges, and to ascertaining the effect of electrostatic discharges and other electrostatic phenomena. TC101 is divided into Working Groups and Project Teams (PT) each with responsibility for different product groups or electrostatic phenomena. WG7 was established to develop an International Standard covering:

  • the evaluation of the electrostatic properties of all types of FIBC that are intended to be used for combustible dusts and/or in flammable or explosive environments;
  • a definition of types of FIBC in relation to their construction and intended use;
  • specification of electrical test methods and requirements.

As the scope of IEC TC101 only allows it to develop standard test methods and means of evaluation, a formal liaison is required with ISO TC122, which has the authority to develop standard performance requirements and classifications for the product groups it covers. The liaison takes the form of a Joint Working Group (JWG7). IEC is the lead organization and so JWG7 is convened under IEC TC101. WG9 of ISO TC122/SC3 is in fact a virtual committee that never actually meets. However, members of WG9 nominated by ISO Members do actively participate in JWG7 meetings.

The latest standard developed by JWG7 was published in October 2005 as a joint logo standard, i.e. IEC/ISO 61340-4-4.

Outline Structure of IEC/ISO 61340-4-4: 2005

  • Requirements for labelling FIBC that claim compliance with the standard;
  • Performance requirements:
    • Properties required to avoid propagating brush discharges ( Type B, Type C & Type D);
    • Properties required for FIBC intended to be earthed (Type C);
    • Properties required for FIBC not intended to be earthed (Type D);
  • Test methods:
    • Breakdown voltage (Type B, Type C & Type D);
    • Ignition tests (Type D);
    • Resistance to ground (Type C);
  • Information to be included in a test report.

The ignition test is based on procedures developed and used over many years by independent test authorities such as BTTG, Chilworth Technology, Swiss Institute for Promotion of Safety & Security, and by industry leader Texene, LLC. The procedures simulate the actual conditions in which FIBC are used. Electrostatic charge is generated when powders, granules or pellets are loaded into or emptied from FIBC. For any FIBC to be considered safe, it must be demonstrated that under such charging conditions no incendiary discharges are produced from the FIBC itself. The purpose of standardizing the test procedure is to ensure universal application of the correct test conditions. The charging current established by JWG7 and incorporated in to the standard is 3 µA. The flammable atmosphere specified in the standard simulates methanol (the most easily ignitable solvent likely to be present when FIBC are used) with a minimum ignition energy of 0.14 mJ.

IEC/ISO 61340-4-4 was published as a full International Standard in October 2005. Copies of the standard can be purchased from the IEC website.

The test procedures specified in IEC/ISO 61340-4-4 are intended principally for type qualification purposes, to demonstrate that a particular design of FIBC constructed from specified materials is safe for use in the presence of a flammable or explosive atmospheres. Other test methods may be more appropriate for routine quality control testing.

In Europe, CENELEC has recently published a Code of Practice for the avoidance of hazards due to static electricity (CLC/TR 50404:2003). The origins of this document are two old established codes from United Kingdom and Germany, BS 5958 and ZH 1/200. The two codes were originally combined in a guidance document published as a CENELEC report R044-001 in 1999. Since then CENELEC Technical Committee CLC/TC44X has worked to update and improve the document with contributions from experts representing National Committees throughout Europe. CLC/TR 50404 has now been sent to IEC for development as an International Standard.

CLC/TR 50404 covers most industrial processes that involve handling solids, powders, liquids, sprays, gases, vapours and explosives. It has one section dedicated to FIBC. For the first time in any standard, FIBC are described using the classification of types that has been used in industry for many years. In recognition of the safety record established by CROHMIQ blue™ static protective FIBC over the last decade, the formal classification adopted by CENELEC experts includes unearthed Type D FIBC and furthermore, CLC/TR 50404 specifies that unearthed Type D FIBC may be used in all areas with equal safety as earthed Type C FIBC as shown in the table below:

Safe Use of Different FIBC Types

Inside FIBC Atmosphere Surrounding FIBC

Non-Flammable Atmosphere Explosive Dust Atmosphere Explosive Gas or Vapour
Non-Flammable
MIE > 1000 mJ
A  B  C  D B  C  D C  D
MIE 3 mJ to 1000 mJ B  C  D B  C  D C  D
MIE < 3 mJ C  D C  D C  D

Definitions of FIBC Types

FIBC Type A FIBC Type A are made from non-conductive fabric and provide no protection against static electricity.
FIBC Type B FIBC Type B are made from non-conductive fabric. They differ from FIBC Type A in that the breakdown voltage through the fabric, including any coating, shall be low enough to prevent propagating brush discharges.

Spark discharges may occur from the surface of FIBC Type B if they become contaminated or coated with conductive material (e.g. water, grease or oil). Precautions should be taken to avoid such contamination and to avoid conductive objects such as tools or metal clips being placed on the FIBC.

FIBC Type C FIBC Type C are made entirely from conductive fabric or from a non-conductive fabric with interconnected conductive threads or filaments. The pattern of conductive threads or filaments is either:

a grid enclosing an area of non-conductive fabric no greater than 25 cm2,

or a 20 mm stripe, in which case each thread or filament must be interconnected at two separate places (usually at both ends).

FIBC Type C must be provided with a grounding point to which all conductive panels, threads or filaments are electrically bonded. The resistance to the grounding point from anywhere on a conductive fabric and from conductive threads or filaments must be less than 108 Ω.

The lift loops of FIBC Type C must also contain conductive threads or filaments with a resistance to the grounding point of less than 108 Ω.

FIBC Type C must also meet the breakdown voltage requirements of FIBC Type B.

In order to prevent spark discharges that might ignite a flammable or explosive atmosphere, it is essential that FIBC Type C are always securely grounded. A label should be attached to the FIBC indicating the position of the grounding point(s) and clearly stating the requirement for grounding. Ungrounded people may become charged through normal activity and could then discharge to ground when touching Type C FIBC. It is essential to follow normal safe practice and ensure that all conductors, including people, are grounded in the presence of flammable or explosive atmospheres.

FIBC Type D FIBC Type D are made from fabric that allows charge to be dissipated without being connected to ground. FIBC Type D fabrics usually contain conductive threads or filaments that dissipate charge safely into the atmosphere by low energy corona discharges. Some FIBC Type D have low resistivity coating that may reduce the risk of incendiary discharges.

Grounding of FIBC Type D is not required.

To be qualified as safe for use in the presence of flammable or explosive atmospheres it must be first demonstrated that FIBC Type D do not produce incendiary discharges under realistic conditions.

Note: The conditions and procedures of test used to demonstrate the absence of incendiary discharges are specified in the draft IEC/ISO 61340-4-4.

FIBC Type D must also meet the breakdown voltage requirements of FIBC Type B.

Ungrounded conductors such a metal drums or people may become charged when positioned close to some FIBC Type D. It is essential to follow normal safe practice and ensure that all conductors are grounded in the presence of flammable or explosive atmospheres.

Spark discharges may occur from the surface of FIBC Type D if they become contaminated or coated with conductive material (e.g. water, grease or oil). Precautions should be taken to avoid such contamination and to avoid conductive objects such as tools or metal clips being placed on the FIBC.

TEXENE LLC, Textile Technologies of the 21st Century
Textile Technologies of the 21st Century


TEXENE LLC is a leading manufacturer of technical textiles focused on delivering precision engineered, safety performance products worldwide.

ARTICLES ON ELECTROSTATICS

STATIC HAZARDS USING FLEXIBLE INTERMEDIATE BULK CONTAINERS FOR POWDER HANDLING
In the early 1990's, Dr Laurence G. Britton, a highly respected process safety engineer with Union Carbide Corp. (later Dow Corp.), conducted a study of fire and explosion incidents that occurred when FIBC were ...

DANGERS OF COMBUSTIBLE DUST EXPLOSIONS, OSHA REGULATIONS, AND ANTISTATIC FIBC
Following three fatal dust explosions in 2003 alone, the US Chemical Safety &amp; Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) launched a wide ranging study of industrial dust explosions.  This first issue of our Electrostatic Safety ...

CHOOSING SAFE STATIC CONTROL FIBC
The second issue of our Electrostatic Safety Review outlines the development of conductive Type C FIBC and the later development of CROHMIQ, the world's first truly effective Type D FIBC fabric, which provides ...

TESTING & CERTIFYING THE SAFETY OF STATIC PROTECTIVE FIBC
The third issue in our series of Electrostatic Safety Reviews describes the rigorous testing that is demanded by national and international standards such (IEC, CENELEC, NFPA, etc.) in order to prove the safety of ...

NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN SAFETY STANDARDS FOR STATIC PROTECTIVE FIBC
Companies that handle combustible powders in bulk bags, or empty products from bulk bags in environments where flammable solvents may be present rely on safe antistatic FIBC to prevent fires and explosions. Proving safety ...

CHEMICAL ACCIDENTS IN THE NEWS

Feb 3rd, 2012
Gas well fire extinguished in Mercer County
A compressor at a Mercer County gas well caught fire early today. The fire was ...

Feb 2nd, 2012
Chemical spill at Middleburg Academy cancels school, one adult hospitalized
Loudoun Fire and Rescue received a call this morning regarding a chemical spill at Middleburg ...

Feb 2nd, 2012
1 hurt in grain elevator explosion
The Hutchinson News ARLINGTON – One man has been taken by ambulance to a Wichita hospital ...

Feb 2nd, 2012
Plant fire extinguished in Dickson, no injuries
DICKSON, Tenn. (AP) — A fire at a Dickson automotive plant has been extinguished and production ...

Feb 2nd, 2012
Welder's spark caused blaze that destroyed Box Elder recycling plant
DEWEYVILLE — Damage may top $1 million in a Wednesday afternoon fire that destroyed a 7,500-square-foot recycling ...

Feb 1st, 2012
Man injured in explosion at Shrewsbury business
SHREWSBURY, Pa. (WHTM) - A 21-year-old man was injured when vapors in a metal drum ...

Jan 31st, 2012
Calif. salami plant to pay $700K for ammonia leak
SAN FRANCISCO The owners of a South San Francisco salami plant will pay nearly $700,000 and ...

Jan 30th, 2012
Workers escape Muskegon Co. factory before explosion
NORTON SHORES, Mich. (NEWSCHANNEL 3) – On Monday dozens of workers had a very close call, escaping ...

Jan 30th, 2012
One Person Transported After Explosion at Madison Chemistry Building
The Madison Fire Department responded to the UW Madison Chemistry Building on the morning of ...

Jan 30th, 2012
Crews finish clean up of minor chemical leak at BASF Corp. in Belvidere
Crews tearing down a tower at the former BASF Corp. chemical plant in Belvidere ruptured ...

Jan 28th, 2012
Welding work sparks explosion, fire in Hyannis
HYANNIS – Welding work and a gas leak sparked an explosion Friday morning at an automobile ...

Jan 28th, 2012
Employees escape injury at Bryant Industries fire
DANVILLE — Two employees at Bryant Industries escaped injury Friday morning when a fire quickly ignited ...

Jan 27th, 2012
13 injured, exposed to carbon monoxide
BLACK RIVER FALLS, Wis. (AP) -- Authorities say a faulty propane tank likely caused carbon ...

Jan 26th, 2012
2 sue for injuries from fire in Derry Township
Two welders claim the negligence of workers for an Oklahoma gas well drilling company resulted ...

Jan 24th, 2012
Investigation of oil well blast ongoing
Enid News and Eagle The Enid News and Eagle Mon Jan 23, 2012, 10:42 PM CST ENID — Oklahoma ...

Jan 24th, 2012
Pinellas Park warehouse evacuated due to chemical reaction
PINELLAS PARK, Fla. - A Pinellas Park warehouse was evacuated after a hazardous material spilled. ...

Jan 21st, 2012
Rig explosion near Marshall injures three
Last Modified: 1/21/2012 2:27 PM MARSHALL — An oil rig explosion in northwest Logan County injured three people ...

Jan 21st, 2012
Toxics from Suncor refinery spill still seeping into water; Colorado vows to "accelerate" response
Black goo is still seeping into waterways from Suncor Energy's oil refinery north of Denver, ...

Jan 20th, 2012
3 hurt in fiery well site explosion near Pearsall
PEARSALL, Texas (AP) - Authorities say three workers have been injured in a fiery explosion ...

Jan 19th, 2012
60-gallon chemical spill triggers haz-mat response at Solutia plant in Indian Orchard
This is an update of a story that was posted at 3:41 p.m. Thursday SPRINGFIELD ...

Jan 19th, 2012
Large Fire in Plantsville
The fire is at 200 Clark St. in Southington....

Jan 19th, 2012
Cause of fire under investigation
GEORGE WEST – The cause of a tank complex fire Friday at Key Energy Services Inc. ...

Jan 19th, 2012
Scrap metal fire enters its third day
The Gazette A rubber tire particle fire at Berkeley Scrap Metal in Moncks Corner is ...

Jan 19th, 2012
Fuel tank explosion sends local man to hospital
A local man using an arc welder on an old fuel tank was sent to ...

Jan 19th, 2012
Blast burns Green River man
| Loading… CASPER, Wyo. — A Green River man was badly burned during an on-the-job explosion in ...

Jan 18th, 2012
Glass embedded in student's chest, abdomen in lab explosion
A University of Florida laboratory explosion last week caused chemical burns on a graduate student's ...

Jan 18th, 2012
Cedar Rapids water plant chlorine leak repaired
CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa (AP) — Firefighters have stopped a chlorine leak that set off an alarm ...

Jan 17th, 2012
Spark in auto shop ignited large fire
COLUMBIA STATION — A spark from a cutting torch accidentally igniting gasoline is believed to have ...

Jan 17th, 2012
Chemical Leak At Avondale Investigated
No injuries reported Authorities are investigating the cause of a chemical leak at the Avondale ...

Jan 17th, 2012
Workers help put out fire at U.S. Steel site in West Mifflin
Production resumed on Sunday at the U.S. Steel Mon Valley Works Irvin Plant after ...